Underlying structure of the wall of a wood cell, showing the substructure of load-bearing cellulose microfibrils
The Forest Products Laboratory of the US Forest Service has opened a
US$1.7 million pilot plant for the production of cellulose nanocrystals
(CNC) from wood by-products materials such as wood chips and sawdust.
Prepared properly, CNCs are stronger and stiffer than Kevlar or carbon
fibers, so that putting CNC into composite materials results in high
strength, low weight products. In addition, the cost of CNCs is less
than ten percent of the cost of Kevlar fiber or carbon fiber. These
qualities have attracted the interest of the military for use in
lightweight armor and ballistic glass (CNCs are transparent), as well as
companies in the automotive, aerospace, electronics, consumer products,
and medical industries.
Cellulose is the most abundant biological polymer on the planet and
it is found in the cell walls of plant and bacterial cells. Composed of
long chains of glucose molecules, cellulose fibers are arranged in an
intricate web that provides both structure and support for plant cells.
The primary commercial source for cellulose is wood, which is
essentially a network of cellulose fibers held together by a matrix of
lignin, another natural polymer which is easily degraded and removed.
Cellulose structures in trees from logs to molecules
Wood pulp is produced in a variety of processes, all of which break
down and wash away the lignin, leaving behind a suspension of cellulose
fibers in water. A typical cellulose wood fiber is only tens of microns
wide and about a millimeter long.
Micrographs of cellulose fibers from wood pulp
The cellulose in wood pulp, when dry, has the consistency of fluff or
lint - a layer of wood pulp cellulose has mechanical properties
reminiscent of a wet paper towel. Not what you might expect to be the
source of one of the strongest materials known to Man. After all, paper
is made from the cellulose in wood pulp, and doesn't show extraordinary
strength or stiffness.
Cellulose
fibers and the smaller structures within them - a) fiber from wood
pulp; b) microcrystalline cellulose; c) microfibrils of cellulose; d)
nanofibrils of cellulose; e) cellulose nanocrystals from wood pulp; f)
CNCs from sea squirts (the only animal source of cellulose
microfibrils); and g,h) cellulose nanofibrils from other sources
Further processing breaks the cellulose fibers down into nanofibrils,
which are about a thousand times smaller than the fibers. In the
nanofibrils, cellulose takes the form of three-dimensional stacks of
unbranched, long strands of glucose molecules, which are held together
by hydrogen bonding. While not being "real" chemical bonds, hydrogen
bonds between cellulose molecules are rather strong, adding to the
strength and stiffness of cellulose nanocrystals.
The
upper figure shows the structure of the cellulose polymer; the middle
figure shows a nanofibril containing both crystalline and amorphous
cellulose; the lower figure shows the cellulose nanocrystals after the
amorphous cellulose is removed by acid hydrolysis
Within these nanofibrils are regions which are very well ordered, in
which cellulose chains are closely packed in parallel with one another.
Typically, several of these crystalline regions appear along a single
nanofibril, and are separated by amorphous regions which do not exhibit a
large degree of order. Individual cellulose nanocrystals are then
produced by dissolving the amorphous regions using a strong acid.
At present the yield for separating CNCs from wood pulp is about 30
percent. There are prospects for minor improvements, but the limiting
factor is the ratio of crystalline to amorphous cellulose in the source
material. A near-term goal for the cost of CNCs is $10 per kilogram, but
large-scale production should reduce that figure to one or two dollars a
kilo.
Cross-sectional
structure of various types of cellulose nanocrystals showing various
crystalline arrangements of the individual cellulose polymer molecules
(the rectangular boxes)
CNCs separated from wood pulp are typically a fraction of a micron
long and have a square cross-section a few nanometers on a side. Their
bulk density is low at 1.6 g/cc, but they exhibit incredible strength.
An elastic modulus of nearly 150 GPa, and a tensile strength of nearly
10 GPa. Here's how its strength to compares to some better-known
materials:
- Material...........................Elastic Modulus................Tensile Strength
- CNC......................................150 GPa.............................7.5 GPa
- Kevlar 49..............................125 GPa.............................3.5 GPa
- Carbon fiber.........................150 GPa.............................3.5 GPa
- Carbon nanotubes..............300 GPa............................20 GPa
- Stainless steel.....................200 GPa............................0.5 GPa
- Oak..........................................10 GPa.............................0.1 GPa
The only reinforcing material that is stronger than cellulose
nanocrystals is a carbon nanotube, which costs about 100 times as much.
Stainless steel is included solely as a comparison to conventional
materials. The relatively very low strength and modulus of oak points
out how much the structure of a composite material can degrade the
mechanical properties of reinforcing materials.
As with most things, cellulose nanocrystals are not a perfect
material. Their greatest nemesis is water. Cellulose is not soluble in
water, nor does it depolymerize. The ether bonds between the glucose
units of the cellulose molecule are not easily broken apart, requiring
strong acids to enable cleavage reactions.
The hydrogen bonds between the cellulose molecules are also too
strong in aggregate to be broken by encroaching water molecules. Indeed,
crystalline cellulose requires treatment by water at 320° C and 250
atmospheres of pressure before enough water intercalates between the
cellulose molecules to cause them to become amorphous in structure. The
cellulose is still not soluble, just disordered from their near-perfect
stacking in the crystalline structure.
But cellulose contains hydroxyl (OH) groups which protrude laterally
along the cellulose molecule. These can form hydrogen bonds with water
molecules, resulting in cellulose being hydrophilic (a drop of water
will tend to spread across the cellulose surface). Given enough water,
cellulose will become engorged with water, swelling to nearly double its
dry volume.
Swelling introduces a large number of nano-defects in the cellulose
structure. Although there is little swelling of a single CNC, water can
penetrate into amorphous cellulose with ease, pushing apart the
individual cellulose molecules in those regions. In addition, the bonds
and interfaces between neighboring CNC will be disrupted, thereby
significantly reducing the strength of any material reinforced with
CNCs. To make matters worse, water can move easily over the
surface/interfaces of the CNCs, thereby allowing water to penetrate far
into a composite containing CNCs.
There are several approaches to make CNC composite materials viable
choices for real world applications. The simplest, but most limited, is
to choose applications in which the composite will not be exposed to
water. Another is to alter the surface chemistry of the cellulose so
that it becomes hydrophobic, or water-repelling. This is easy enough to
do, but will likely substantially degrade the mechanical properties of
the altered CNCs. A third approach is to choose a matrix material which
is hydrophobic, and preferably that forms a hydrophobic interface with
CNCs. While not particularly difficult from a purely chemical viewpoint,
there is the practical difficulty that interfaces between hydrophobic
and hydrophilic materials are usually severely lacking in strength.
Perhaps the most practical approach will simply be to paint or
otherwise coat CNC composite materials in some material that keeps water
away. For such a prize - inexpensive strong and rigid materials - we
can be sure that innovations will follow to make the theoretical
practical.
Source:
US Forest Service